Dialysis industry news

Stories from the dialysis comunity across the globe.



As star ratings take hold, dialysis provider DaVita says treatments are on the ... - Healthcare Finance News PDF Print

Despite the move towards prevention and home care, dialysis providers are going to continue seeing growth. Despite the move towards prevention and home care, dialysis providers are going to continue seeing growth.

Though new transparency rules worry dialysis providers, DaVita HealthCare Partners says the demand for the kidney-care services is driving its business forward.

Earlier this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the first time published five star quality ratings on dialysis providers, sparking concern from major clinic operator DaVita HealthCare Partners and its peers about the methodology going into the process. For DaVita, though, the scores were good, with the company making up more than 50 percent of the 5-star facilities.

"We have enough metrics and proxies that while it might not be perfect, it is useful in making your decision,"  aid Javier Rodriguez, CEO of DaVita Kidney Care, the large division of DaVita.

The Dialysis Facility Compare star ratings measure nine aspects of the treatment, including standard mortality, hospitalizations, transfusions and the percentage of patients using catheters or fistulas, a surgical connection of arteries and veins that can help avoid the infections associated with catheters. 

[Also:DaVita HealthCare CFO resigns after settlements sting dialysis provider]

Over the last decade, when DaVita was growing nationally, "we thought about getting patients the best outcome out of the hospital, and one of them is the fistula," Rodriguez said.

"10 years ago, we said to a panel of 10 nephrologists, 'What would be the biggest gift we could give to patients?' The answer was reduce the catheters," Rodriguez said, even though "conventional wisdom always said you can't reduce it."

DaVita ended up bringing down the percentage of patients with catheters from more than 25 percent to around 13 percent, while increasing the use of a fistula to more than 65 percent, in line with recommendation of CMS and the National Kidney Foundation.

"The data helped us start conversations with medical leaders about improving," Rodriguez said.

Rodriguez joined DaVita in 1998, just as CEO Kent Thiry was trying to start a turnaround of the near-bankrupt Total Renal Care. The new DaVita, headquartered in Denver, went on to become one of the two largest dialysis providers in the country, with profits consistent enough for Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway owns 17 percent of the company.

But DaVita has its problems, too. It's facing as much as $495 million in liability for a number of whistleblower lawsuits alleging referral schemes and physician contracting violations, but the company said it is investing $25 million in legal compliance. The company is also trying to keep growing, though, through joint ventures. After a $4 billion acquisition in 2012, DaVita HealthCare Partners is largely comprised of two different businesses, one a large dialysis provider and the other an operator of medical groups in value-based networks.

HealthCare Partners has management and operation ventures helping run medical groups and physician networks in California, Colorado Nevada, Florida, and Pennsylvania. One joint venture is with Philadelphia insurer Independence Blue Cross, a primary care-focused narrow network branded as Tandigm Health.

HealthCare Partners uses a "team-based approach," with a "team of primary care providers, specialists, case managers and other professionals who work together to manage all aspects of patient's' care and overall health," wrote Tracy Wakefield, MD, a HealthCare Partners physician in Nevada. "This includes a strong focus on prevention and assisting patients with maximizing their health insurance benefits."

Follow Healthcare Finance on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Rodriguez, head of DaVita's dialysis company, said those efforts on prevention won't diminish the incidence of end-stage renal disease and the need for dialysis anytime soon.

"Maybe in 20 years, but if you look at the ingrained habits of America, diet, exercise and smoking, those habits are not going to change in 5 year time horizon," he said. "The ESRD trend will take a while to reverse. People have been trying for years."

Kidney care delivery, including dialysis and the potential rise of home-based peritoneal dialysis, "is going to change," Rodriguez said. "We will be accountable for a lot more of their care."

Even though it is growing, the rise of home-based dialysis will likely not overtake the facility-based hemodialysis, Rodriguez argued. Hemodialysis requires patients who spend 12 or more hours a week in a clinic but can use the fistula and avoid infections and clots. Peritoneal dialysis lets patients use a catheter-based system at home or as they travel.

"For a long time, conventional wisdom would say, wouldn't people want to get it at home? The modality hasn't grown."

Especially for some patients, he argued, dialysis can be a beneficial ritual of coming to the clinic, talking with staff or listening to music. It's a similar unnoticed benefit with community pharmacies. For some seniors, a trip to CVS or RiteAid can be one of few trips away from home. "A lot of patients need help, and in a lot of our centers, they have a very social and home feel to them," Rodriguez said.

Twitter: @AnthonyBrino

...

 
Bringing Nephrology Care to Where It Is Needed - Medscape PDF Print

Medscape

Bringing Nephrology Care to Where It Is Needed
Medscape
Bringing Nephrology Care to Where It Is Needed. Ingrid G. Hein. Disclosures July 22, 2015. Print. Editors' Recommendations. Responding to Natural Disasters: The View From Nepal; Should You Volunteer in a Disaster? Advice for Physicians; Earthquakes, ...

...

 
Bringing Nephrology Care to Where It Is Needed - Medscape - Medscape PDF Print

In order to use Medscape, your browser must be set to accept cookies delivered by the Medscape site.

Medscape uses cookies to customize the site based on the information we collect at registration. The cookies contain no personally identifiable information and have no effect once you leave the Medscape site.

...

 
Study Probes Boiling Methods for Cutting Phosphorus in Meat - Renal and ... - Renal and Urology News PDF Print
July 22, 2015 Study Probes Boiling Methods for Cutting Phosphorus in Meat - Renal and ... - Renal and Urology News
Boiling sliced meat in a pressure cooker filled with soft water may be a promising way for dialysis patients to reduce phosphorus intake.

Boiling sliced meat in a pressure cooker containing soft water and then discarding the cooking liquid may provide a good way for dialysis patients to reduce phosphorus levels while maintaining adequate protein intake, a new study suggests.

Masae Sakuma, PhD, and colleagues from the University of Shizuoka in Japan, assessed the phosphorus and protein content of beef cooked in a variety of ways. They cut beef in 100 gram blocks, cubes, or slices (i.e., muscle fibers cut vertically). They used different cooking liquids, including soft bottled water, hard water, 5% acetate solution (i.e., a mixture of soft water and vinegar), and 0.5% sodium bicarbonate water (i.e., a mixture of soft water and sodium bicarbonate). They cooked the beef either in a regular pan or pressure cooker for 10 or 30 minutes.

According to results published online ahead of print by the Journal of Renal Nutrition, certain methods decreased the phosphorus content of the meat the most. Soft water was the best cooking liquid, probably due to preferential osmotic pressure. Sliced meat appeared to provide a large surface area for phosphorus to exit. Likewise, pressure cookers, which allow cooking at a higher temperature and pressure, allowed the muscle fibers in meat to flex easily so phosphorus flowed readily. Since phosphorus leaches into the cooking liquid, the liquid must be discarded. Based on previous research, the investigators further suggested that boiling meat is more effective at reducing phosphorus than pre-soaking it.

Importantly, the protein content of the meat stayed the same. “The dissociation between phosphorus and protein is possible because boiling may easily influence the discharge of phosphorus from the intercellular and extracellular spaces and from the phospholipids of cell membranes, whereas proteins remain within the cells and are not lost in the boiling fluids,” the investigators explained.

The cooking advice is particularly valuable for dialysis patients who need to avoid protein-energy malnutrition. Rather than consume only low phosphorus foods, which tend to be low in protein, they can cook meat to lower phosphorus while retaining protein. The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quantity Initiative guidelines recommend a daily phosphorus intake of 10 to 12 mg per gram of protein.   

Source
  1. Ando, S; Sakuma, M; Morimoto, Y; and Arai, H. Published online by Journal of Renal Nutrition, July 2015; doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.05.005.

...

 
BMI Doesn't Affect Kidney Transplant Survival - Renal and Urology News PDF Print
July 22, 2015 BMI Doesn't Affect Kidney Transplant Survival - Renal and Urology News
No difference between defined BMI bands in patient or graft survival for transplanted patients.

(HealthDay News) -- For patients undergoing kidney transplantation, survival is unaffected by body mass index (BMI), according to a study published online in the American Journal of Transplantation.

Nithya Krishnan, M.B.B.S., from the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust in the United Kingdom, and colleagues examined the impact of BMI on mortality in transplanted patients and those remaining on the waiting list in the United Kingdom. Data were analyzed from the U.K. Renal Registry and the National Health Service Blood and Transplant Organ Donation and Transplantation. From Jan. 1, 2004, to Dec. 31, 2010, 17,681 patients were listed, and BMI was recorded for 77%. Patients were followed through Dec. 31, 2011.

The researchers found that in all BMI bands, 1- and 5-year patient survival was significantly better in the transplant group versus the waiting list group. The results were essentially the same in analyses excluding live donor transplants. There was no cutoff observed among patients with higher BMI where there would be no benefit of transplantation in analyses of survival with BMI as a continuous variable. There was no difference in patient or graft survival between the defined BMI bands for the 8,088 transplanted patients.

"As BMI in the population is rising and likely to continue to rise, it is important that Renal Units respond to this challenge with positive attitude toward widening access to transplant," the authors write.

Sources

  1. Krishnan, N; Higgins, R; Short, A; et al. American Journal of Transplantation; doi: 10.1111/ajt.13363.
  2. Kalantar-Zadeh, K; von Visger, J; Foster, E; et al. American Journal of Transplantation; doi: 10.1111/ajt.13367.

...

 
<< Start < Prev 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Next > End >>

Page 76 of 4210
Share |
Copyright © 2025 Global Dialysis. All Rights Reserved.